Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
membership:access_for_cluster_libraries [2014/09/02 17:03] – [Access for Cluster libraries] hart | membership:access_for_cluster_libraries [2014/09/02 17:23] – [Decision to approve] hart | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
Nevertheless, | Nevertheless, | ||
- | * The libraries will operate under the aegis of one Full member. | + | * The libraries will operate under the aegis of one Single |
* They will have important collections and/or automated files in progress of significance for the HPB Database which in due course may benefit. | * They will have important collections and/or automated files in progress of significance for the HPB Database which in due course may benefit. | ||
* Since the Consortium’s aim is to make the database as comprehensive as possible, it hopes to include any files created in the cluster libraries. | * Since the Consortium’s aim is to make the database as comprehensive as possible, it hopes to include any files created in the cluster libraries. | ||
* They will have in common either a local or regional or national location, or specialist subject matter (e.g. medicine, architecture). | * They will have in common either a local or regional or national location, or specialist subject matter (e.g. medicine, architecture). | ||
- | * The criterion ' | + | * The criterion ' |
- | * It is not feasible to expect that they will be able to become a Full member, a Special member or a partner in a Group membership. | + | * It is not feasible to expect that they will be able to become a Single |
===== Decision to approve ===== | ===== Decision to approve ===== | ||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
Since it is clearly not possible to formulate a set of absolute criteria, it follows that each proposal will have to be judged on its individual merits. | Since it is clearly not possible to formulate a set of absolute criteria, it follows that each proposal will have to be judged on its individual merits. | ||
- | The CERL Board of Directors is the governing body in control of membership. The decision to accept a proposal made by a Full member will therefore be made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. A standard period is however agreed as the term after which the arrangement should be reviewed. | + | The CERL Board of Directors is the governing body in control of membership. The decision to accept a proposal made by a Single |
membership/access_for_cluster_libraries.txt · Last modified: 2014/09/02 17:24 by hart