Home | Resources | Services | Hosting | Publications | Collaboration | Joining CERL | About CERL |

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revisionBoth sides next revision
collaboration:projects:republic_of_letters [2016/07/06 10:04] leffertscollaboration:projects:republic_of_letters [2016/07/06 10:21] lefferts
Line 31: Line 31:
 The third day of the conference was mainly dedicated to the methods of the visualization of the Republic of Letters and there were presented works of Working Group 3 and 6. Thomas Wallning from Austria presented the results of a three years’ work by team of researchers, who studied early modern correspondence. They analysed the vocabulary of letters, neologisms, regionalisms, the length of sentences, and the grammatical rules. They attempted to find answers to the following questions: how did the Latin language inform the writers about scholar-monks, and how the European languages were Latinized. The third day of the conference was mainly dedicated to the methods of the visualization of the Republic of Letters and there were presented works of Working Group 3 and 6. Thomas Wallning from Austria presented the results of a three years’ work by team of researchers, who studied early modern correspondence. They analysed the vocabulary of letters, neologisms, regionalisms, the length of sentences, and the grammatical rules. They attempted to find answers to the following questions: how did the Latin language inform the writers about scholar-monks, and how the European languages were Latinized.
  
-Lucie Storchová, Vladimír Urbánek and Mihal Descalu, from the Czech Republic, presented methods of analysis of letters of Jan Amos Komensky. The researchers made a map of the intellectual circle of his correspondents, and showed the structures of sentences, the metaphors, and the emotional code of the writings.  Statistics of the frequency of words, the number of words in sentence and in the paragraph, were presented too.+Lucie Storchová, Vladimír Urbánek and Mihal Descalu, from the Czech Republic, presented [[http://emlo-portal.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/collections/?catalogue=jan-amos-comenius|methods of analysis of letters of Jan Amos Komensky]]. The researchers made a map of the intellectual circle of his correspondents, and showed the structures of sentences, the metaphors, and the emotional code of the writings.  Statistics of the frequency of words, the number of words in sentence and in the paragraph, were presented too.
  
 Karen Hollewand delivered a very interesting presentation entitled “Keywords, text and Beverland”. The researcher demonstrated the role of keywords in the process of selecting data, and in the analysis of correspondence. Keywords help to show the specific vocabulary of the author and the limited sphere, in which they are used. They help us to understand and identify the specific language and style of the author. Karen Hollewand delivered a very interesting presentation entitled “Keywords, text and Beverland”. The researcher demonstrated the role of keywords in the process of selecting data, and in the analysis of correspondence. Keywords help to show the specific vocabulary of the author and the limited sphere, in which they are used. They help us to understand and identify the specific language and style of the author.
 collaboration/projects/republic_of_letters.txt · Last modified: 2016/07/06 10:25 by lefferts

 

 

Recent changes RSS feed Valid XHTML 1.0 Driven by DokuWiki